Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Friends: 8 killed in NO fire musicians, artists


NEW ORLEANS Eight homeless squatters who died in a fire at an abandoned warehouse where they were trying to keep warm were accomplished musicians and artists who rejected the label "gutter punk," acquaintances said.


Firefighters said they could not tell the ages or genders of those who died Tuesday in the city's deadliest blaze in decades because their bodies were so badly burned. A 23-year-old man who escaped told the American Red Cross he could not get back in to help his friends because of the smoke, agency volunteer Thomas Butler said. The group had been burning debris to keep warm, with temperatures below freezing, authorities said.


A group of young people sitting on the steps of an abandoned house near the warehouse said the dead included three women and five men.


Rachel Park, 27, of California, estimated their ages ranged from 19 to 30. The victims never thought of themselves as homeless and rejected the "gutter punk" label used by some locals to describe transient youths, who are often seen begging for money or cigarettes on French Quarter Streets, she said.


"They were all accomplished musicians or artists jolly, happy people," Park said.


Park knew the victims by first names only and said one or two were from the New Orleans area, while the others were from elsewhere in the U.S.


Temperatures were just below freezing, unusually cold for New Orleans. The warehouse is in a blighted city neighborhood left even more so by the flooding that followed Hurricane Katrina in 2005.


Linda Gonzales, of the New Orleans Mission, said homeless young adults and teenagers often avoid shelters for several reasons.


"Some of them choose to stay out and you can't make them come in," she said.


The blaze was reported just before 2 a.m., and fire trucks arrived within five minutes to find the building engulfed in flames, fire department spokesman Greg Davis said. Some of the victims may have been rendered unconscious by carbon monoxide, a danger with indoor fires.


All that was left of the warehouse, which sat amid graffiti-covered rail cars and ramshackle buildings, was the blackened foundation and a partial shell of singed corrugated metal.


Nearby, inhabited wood-frame houses, some with Christmas decorations, are interspersed with boarded-up homes with holes in the roofs. The city has more than 55,000 such blighted properties, according to current estimates.


A 22-year-old woman who was not in the warehouse when the fire started told the Red Cross she was one of several squatters who had been using the building for shelter.


Three young people who watched from across the street as firefighters searched for victims with dogs said they knew those who died but would not say more.


Later Tuesday, Audrey Bean, 19, of Philadelphia, strummed a ukulele. "I was living in there with them for a few weeks," she said.


Park and Bean were among a small group of young people in worn clothing, their hands and faces dirty. They piled into a beat-up van and drove away shortly before dusk near the burned remains of the building. There they left what they called an altar: A collection of beer cans, candles, a stuffed dog, and a sign with the words "hungry and homeless" in the middle of it all.


Capt. Edwin Holmes said it was among the deadliest fires in the modern history of the New Orleans Fire Department, and the worst since 32 died in a fire at a French Quarter lounge in 1973.


Homelessness is a problem that has worsened since Katrina. Gonzales estimated as many as 3,000 people with nowhere to go may be on the streets on any given night. Shelters only have about 800 beds available, she said, though the city works with them to provide more when temperatures hover near or below freezing.


Still, said resident Ricky Gordon, many homeless people show up in the neighborhood when it's cold rather than taking advantage of available social services.


"I took one guy in last night myself," he said.


___


Associated Press Writer Janet McConnaughey contributed to this report.

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Early Balding Linked to Risk of Prostate Cancer

Men's Health

Early Balding Linked to Risk of Prostate Cancer


Published February 16, 2011

| Reuters

  • Print
  • Comments
  • Recommend


A study showing that men who start to go bald at 20 may be more likely to develop prostate cancer in later life suggests they might benefit from early screening or preventative therapy, scientists said.


French researchers compared 388 men being treated for prostate cancer with 281 healthy men and found that those with the disease were twice as likely as the healthy men to have started losing their hair when they were 20.


If the men only started going bald when they were 30 or 40, there was no difference in their risk of developing prostate cancer compared to the healthy group.


"At present there is no hard evidence to show any benefit from screening the general population for prostate cancer. We need a way of identifying those men who are at high risk," said Philippe Giraud of Paris Descartes University, who led the study.


"Balding at the age of 20 may be one of these easily identifiable risk factors and more work needs to be done now to confirm this," he said in a statement.


Giraud, whose findings were published in the cancer journal Annals of Oncology, said men identified as at higher risk of prostate cancer could be selected for earlier screening, or for chemo-prevention therapy using so-called anti-androgenic drugs like Merck's Proscar, or finasteride.


Finasteride is used to treat both prostate enlargement symptoms and baldness. It blocks the conversion of testosterone to an androgen hormone called dihydrotestosterone, which is thought to cause hair loss.


GlaxoSmithKline has a drug in the same class called Avodart, or dutasteride, and is currently seeking approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for a license for use in men at higher risk of developing prostate cancer. But an FDA panel advised last month that GSK's application should be rejected.


Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men after lung cancer and kills an estimated 255,000 men each year.

Androgenic alopecia, also known as male pattern baldness, affects around 50 percent of men in their lifetime.


Previous studies have established a link between baldness and androgenic hormones, and androgens also play a role in the development and growth of prostate cancer.


Giraud and Michael Yassa of the University of Montreal in Canada, who also worked on the study, asked men to fill in a questionnaire about their history of prostate cancer, if any, and to indicate any hair loss they had at ages 20, 30 and 40 using pictures graded from stage I (no hair loss), to stage IV (receding hairline and balding from the top of the head).


The men's doctors also provided patients' medical histories, including any diagnosis of prostate cancer, age at diagnosis, stage of the disease and treatment. The study ran for 28 months.


"The data revealed that any balding at stages II-IV was associated with double the risk of prostate cancer later in life. This trend was lost at ages 30 and 40," said Yassa.


"Further work should be done, both at the molecular level and with larger groups of men, to find the missing link between androgens, early balding and prostate cancer."

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Will Tim Cook be the next Steve Jobs?


Last month, after a press event at Apple’s Cupertino headquarters, I made an off-the-cuff observation about the future leadership of the company. In short, I commented on how Chief Operating Officer Tim Cook, who took a portion of stage time from Jobs to talk about new notebooks, was wearing blue jeans and a black shirt - Jobs’ signature outfit. Granted, a wardrobe does not make anyone worthy of a CEO title. But, given concerns this year about Jobs’ health, it suddenly felt like Cook - who filled in as CEO for two months in 2004 while Jobs recovered from pancreatic cancer surgery - could be the successor when and if Jobs no longer carries the big title.Tim Cook and Steve Jobs

Now, Fortune magazine has published a pretty lengthy piece, called “The genius behind Steve,” which looks at Cook - as well as a couple of other execs - who could be positioned to take the reins. (Techmeme) It’s a good read that offers a deeper look into Cook as an executive and a human being. Consider these excerpts from Fortune:

Jobs has seen to it that Cook is getting public exposure, especially on Wall Street. He is a fixture on Apple’s quarterly earnings calls, and he speaks at select investment conferences. “Operationally, when you think about what they’ve done - a massive retail-stores ramp, an expanded sales-channel presence, delivering new products without glitches, and managing huge seasonality - all speak to a company that is exceedingly well run,” says (Toni) Sacconaghi, the Sanford Bernstein analyst, referring almost wholly to aspects of the company that Cook oversees.

Though he’s capable of mirth, Cook’s default facial expression is a frown, and his humor is of the dry variety. In meetings he’s known for long, uncomfortable pauses, when all you hear is the sound of his tearing the wrapper of the energy bars he constantly eats… Cook’s stamina is the stuff of legend at Apple. He often begins e-mailing the executives who work for him at 4:30 a.m.; worldwide conference calls can take place at any time of day. For years, Cook held a standing Sunday night staff meeting by telephone in order to prepare for yet more meetings on Monday morning.

Sure, Cook is a leader at Apple and his team has been behind some of the more successful business and product moves at the company. But does that make him a natural successor to Jobs (assuming he would even want the position)?

Outside Apple, many observers, informed and otherwise, assume Cook can’t be Apple’s next chief executive. “Nobody would make Tim Cook CEO,” says a Silicon Valley investor who travels in the Apple orbit. “That’s laughable. They don’t need a guy who merely” gets stuff done. “They need a brilliant product guy, and Tim is not that guy. He is an ops guy - at a company where ops is outsourced.” Michel Mayer, who was CEO of Freescale Semiconductor when it supplied Apple with microprocessors, has a slightly more positive take. “I’m not sure he’d be able to replace Steve’s design creativity,” Mayer says. “Then again, I could argue that it’s not the role of the next CEO to do that.”

Why is the successor to Steve Jobs such a big deal? Clearly, Jobs has become the face of Apple. And when he appeared at a conference earlier this year looking less than healthy, Wall Street wanted to know if he was OK. Then, Bloomberg accidentally posted his obituary. And, finally, when a citizen journalist falsely reported on a CNN site that Steve Jobs had suffered a heart attack, shares of the company immediately started nose-diving.

Apple declined comment for the Fortune piece. Still, it goes to show that Apple is one of those companies that generates a lot of interest. And those with an interest clearly want to know more about the contingency plan if Steve Jobs suddenly can no longer run the company.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

The problem with e-fits

Hampshire police's E-FIT

Police have had no response to the E-FIT

"If the witness tells you the suspect has green hair, then you just have to go with it," says psychologist Dr Jim Turner of the Open University, an expert in facial perception.

E-fits are produced by an operator working under the direction of a witness. Police have to follow strict guidelines and can only respond in a way which is led by the witness, says Dr Chris Solomon, managing director of VisionMetric Ltd, which produces the E-FIT software used by 90% of police forces in the UK.

Both parties are also required to sign a witness statement to the effect that the operator has not "led" the witness towards a particular likeness. It means the quality of the images cannot be altered by the operator without direction from the witness.

They are often working from memory and sometimes in a distressed state. They also might not have seen the suspect's face for very long or be unable to recall a lot of detail. In the case of the lettuce e-fit, the victim was 85 years old.

'Hostage to ridicule'

"For these reasons, results with e-fits can vary widely," says Dr Solomon. Ultimately, they can only be as good as the witness.

The courts have long recognised the fallibility of onlookers' testimony. In 1976, the Devlin Committee's investigation of identification evidence found that many witnesses overstated their ability to single out the right person.

Continue reading the main story












In today's Magazine





  • Could the UK work with two different time zones?

  • Andrej Pejic: The man modelling womenswear

  • The non-job row

  • What exactly is a Cornish pasty?







A recent study involving the Open University, the BBC and Greater Manchester Police (GMP) tested the memories of 10 volunteers by mocking-up "crimes". It found the difference between what people though they'd witnessed and what had actually happened was "staggering".

These are not the only potential problems. Witnesses and the acquaintances of the suspects whom police want to reach will be looking for very different things in an e-fit, says Dr Turner.

"When you don't know someone - as will be the case with most witnesses who end up doing an e-fit - you tend to focus on their external features, such as their hair or the shape of their face," he says.

"But when you do know someone, it's their internal features you notice, that's why you can still recognise someone when they get their hair cut. So there's a disconnect that you have to get over."

Of course e-fit has been designed to mitigate against this. When creating an image, the operator will ask the witness to recall everything they can about the suspect.

Great value

The computer programme will generate a face that may not initially resemble the suspect, but as the shapes, sizes and positions of each feature are altered the picture will - hopefully - offer a more accurate representation.

However, there are still more potential pitfalls. Professor Peter Hancock of Stirling University, who has been involved in the development of evoFIT, an alternative identification programme, believes use of colour is a distraction - and, in the "lettuce head" case, a hostage to ridicule.

Photo and EvoFIT of Ross Gleave

Rapist Ross Gleave was caught with the help of EvoFIT

"If you get the hair right, for instance, it doesn't make a lot of difference," he says. "But if you get it wrong, it just looks stupid - as this case shows. That's why evoFIT is in black and white."

With this system, users repeatedly select complete faces from screens of alternatives to allow a composite to "evolve". The approach has the potential to allow construction when a witness has seen the face, but cannot describe it in detail.

What all those involved in the area agree is the relationship between the operator and the witness has to be right for the technique to work.

Bruce Burn, 56, worked as an artist for Northumbria Police in the days before e-fit, but says the principles for coaxing a good image out of a witness are the same.

"The biggest danger is that they defer to you because you're the artist or the police officer," he says. "You need to ensure that they can be hard on you and say 'no, that's rubbish' - otherwise it's not their recollection that you're capturing."

Research suggests that such composites only have an accuracy rate of about 20%. But when you have nothing else to go on they can be good odds.

"Composites images are often used when the police have no other means to attempt to identify a suspect," says Dr Solomon. "As such they perform a very important function and one often not well understood by the public."

Below is a selection of your comments


I think the lettuce hair has worked wonders, a lot more people would have seen this picture! Something to ridicule or clever ploy? I guess we'll have to wait and see.

Claire, UK

I was kidnapped, robbed and raped when I was in my mid 30s. I was given the option by the police, of either doing an e-fit profile immediately after the crime, or waiting until the next day. I chose to both give the statement and give the suspects description to the e-fit expert, within an hour of the event. My reasoning was that I wanted to pass on the information, that I was holding, as soon as possible, then I would be able to "let go" of the incident and start to heal. I later found from working in police training, that this timing is often easier for crime victims, as shock often protects the brain from trauma overload for a few hours. This shock may protect and insulate the victim emotionally. (We did gain a conviction and my E-Fit was incredibly close to the later arrest "mug shot".)

Pat, Merseyside

I had to provide an e-fit of a man who attacked me the day before my 16th birthday. On my 16th birthday I spent two hours with a police officer constructing an efit. I can say from experience that it is extremely difficult to do. Many people who have been assaulted would prefer to block out the face of the person who did it. What would have helped in my case is if the people who had witnessed the attack had come forward to help me at the time. I did the best I could with my efit but still didn't feel happy with it at the end. By the time you have looked at hundreds of different noses you can't trust your own memory any more.

Kathryn , Newcastle

A lot of people who have to give descriptions or work with an operator to build an E-Fit, will have a very hard time Consciously remembering the face of the criminal. Just like when you see a face in a dream, but cant remember the exact details when you awake. If you were to ask the average person to create an E-fit of their own face, without use of a mirror, they wouldn't be able to provide an exact image.

Mr Be, Portsmouth

If I recall correctly, there was an efit type of picture of the yorkshire ripper, which was very accurate.

John, Kent

There's been a lot of rubbishing of "lettuce head" and comments that make out the witnesses must be either suffering from dementia or just plain stupid. The detractors all seem to ignore the fact that some people DO HAVE green hair. Hair dyes have existed for quite a long time and this suspect just might have used one.

Ruth, Bucks

In normal circumstances , trying to describe a face feature could be hard but if you have been indirectly involved in an incident and harmed in any way , to remember a person's features after extreme stress is nigh on impossible to most people. The examples that were used in this article is a prime example of how hard it would be for the Police to determine a criminal's guilt.

David Forbes, Milton of Campsie

Elizabeth Loftus et al is a woman who did a study about photofits, it is very difficult to remember a persons face especially is there is a weapon involved. People will instantly focus on the weapon and adrenaline will take hold, it is very difficult to remember a persons face after an incident like this. Another study, done by Bruce et al discovered that people do not remember faces by the "internal" features i.e the eyes, nose, mouth etc. They mainly remember the external features such as hair, face shape and ears. Police when doing photofits focus on the internal features rather than external which makes sense, considering there are many people with similar hair, but it isn't so easy to remember those things. It has to be said though, some photofits are very accurate and some are down right atrocious.

Abby, Leeds

A lot of people who have to give descriptions or work with an operator to build an E-Fit, will have a very hard time Consciously remembering the face of the criminal. Just like when you see a face in a dream, but cant remember the exact details when you awake. If you were to ask the average person to create an E-fit of their own face, without use of a mirror, they wouldn't be able to provide an exact image.

McBe, Portsmouth